Fable
The same workbook was handed out to many apprentices
The academy needed to copy a great compendium, and a single scribe could not finish it in a year. The headmaster gave the same set of models and ink shades to multiple groups of apprentices, each handling different pages, with the goal of shortening the total duration.
Each group can write in parallel, but every group must follow the same format. If one group changes the lettering on the fly, there will be a break when the scrolls are combined; if someone submits early, the other groups still cannot skip their own page order because of it.
Every day the mountain chief collected corrections from each group and sent the common correction rules back to all desks. The joint proofreading here was not stitching pages together, but merging the updates each copy learned from its own samples into the same model state.
The more apprentices there were, the more frequently errata were passed among them. The academy began proofreading in batches and recording slow groups and absent groups, to avoid waiting, communication overhead, or a single point of absence canceling out the benefits of parallelism.
Data parallelism improves throughput; it does not automatically solve synchronization, load, global batch, or failure issues. The larger the scale, the more important the merge rules and communication budget become.