Fable
The self-taught apprentice in the missing-character ledger
The young apprentice finds practice questions from the pages themselves, lets the context provide clues, and then checks the answers against the original paper; there is no need to wait for the teacher to grade page by page.
Facing thousands of pages of material, sentence-by-sentence human explanation cannot cover it; relying only on a few sample texts cannot teach unfamiliar expressions.
Memorizing only model essays with answers raises short-term scores, but locks training into familiar questions, and the broad patterns in the material are still not learned.
The old craftsman automatically creates questions from the original book: masking words, continuing text or matching fragments, and uses the answers in context as supervision signals.
The master covered half a sentence on a page, shuffled the chapter order, and erased the title, letting the apprentice fill it back in from context and then compare it with the original scroll. This step was troublesome and at first slowed the schedule; but after several rounds, there was less rework, and the master no longer changed the rules on a whim. Everyone finally saw that, therefore, tasks constructed from the data itself can expand training scale, but downstream evaluation is still required to test the learned capabilities.
Only after the apprentice had accumulated enough practice did a small amount of human commentary produce real added value.
The apprentice did it thousands of times and gradually understood how words and phrases connect; later, a small amount of commentary could wake him up. From then on, some teaching materials in the world did not need to be labeled item by item by people; the gaps within the material itself could force one to learn the structure.