← Back to Concept Contrast

Concept Contrast Fable

Pilot and co-creation: are you here to test or to build together

Conclusion first:When facing B2B clients, pilots and co-creation are often treated as the same kind of early collaboration. A pilot is when the client runs your finished product within a controlled scope to verify results; co-creation is designing the solution together with the client from the requirements definition stage. Treat a pilot as co-creation, and you will invest too much in a client who may not sign; treat co-creation as a pilot, and the truly deep requirements will be missed.

When facing B2B clients, pilots and co-creation are often treated as the same kind of early collaboration. A pilot is when the client runs your finished product within a controlled scope to verify results; co-creation is designing the solution together with the client from the requirements definition stage. Treat a pilot as co-creation, and you will invest too much in a client who may not sign; treat co-creation as a pilot, and the truly deep requirements will be missed.

Fable

The tailor shop’s two fitting rooms

The old tailor shop took orders in two ways. The first was when a customer came to the shop, picked a roughly suitable ready-made garment from those hanging, and tried it on while the tailor watched the shoulder width, sleeve length and waist to see where minor adjustments were needed; a few alterations and the sale was done. The second was when a customer came in with their own ideas and a sketch, and the tailor and customer chose fabric together, determined the cut, and made repeated samples, producing a garment that had never existed before.

One year the shop did good business, the apprentice was overwhelmed, and began mixing the two approaches. A customer merely came to try on a ready-made garment to see if it fit, but the apprentice enthusiastically pulled him into discussing pattern modification plans, drew three versions of diagrams, and the customer finally said "I'll look again" and left. On the other side, a regular customer who came with a custom requirement was only told by the apprentice to pick a similar ready-made garment from the rack and have it altered; after receiving it, the customer was silent for two weeks and canceled the order.

After the shop lost six orders, the master tailor halted all order-taking and had the apprentice first classify every customer who came in: are you here to pick one of the existing styles and make slight adjustments, or to make a new garment together with us. The classification result was written at the top of the order and determined the subsequent labor input, quoting method, and delivery cycle.

The effect after classification was immediate. Customers trying ready-made garments left the store in forty minutes on average, and the closing rate rose from twenty percent to nearly fifty percent. Custom customers invested more per visit, but their average order value was six times that of ready-made garments, and after finishing one piece they often brought friends along. The two types of customers each had their own channel, and neither held up the other.

The tailor later summed up a rule: for someone trying on ready-made clothes, you give them options and they make a choice; for someone getting bespoke tailoring, you give them a process and they give you judgment. The worst thing is selling a choice as a process, or a process as a choice — neither side is satisfied, and you don't even know at which step the problem lies.

This rule was later written into the shop's new apprentice handbook, and even the cost of ink was calculated clearly: the cost of trying on ready-made clothing lies in fabric loss, while the cost of custom tailoring lies in labor hours and back-and-forth communication. If you confuse the two, you will use custom-tailoring labor hours to serve someone who only plans to try on clothes, and you will use ready-made standards to deliver a solution that requires co-creation. The former costs time; the latter costs reputation.

Pilot

The customer uses an existing product or solution within a controlled scope, verifies results and assesses risk before deciding whether to make a formal purchase; the core is testing existing capabilities.

Co-creation

Co-design the solution with the customer from the requirements definition stage, with both sides jointly investing resources and judgment throughout the process, producing a customized or semi-customized solution.

Story Mapping

  • Pick one from the hanging ready-made clothes to try on: pilot, validating an existing product within a controlled scope
  • Choosing fabric and repeatedly making samples with the customer: co-creation, jointly designing the solution from the requirements stage
  • Apprentice confusion leads to losing customers on both sides: failing to distinguish pilots from co-creation wastes resources and loses deals
  • Order header classification determines labor quote delivery cycle: allocate investment and expectations by cooperation type

Applying it to an Agent project

At first contact with a client, determine first: are they taking your Agent to run in a department for a month to see results (pilot), or do they want you to redesign the Agent's behavior and output according to their business flow (co-creation). For a pilot, sign a trial agreement, issue weekly results reports and decide at expiry; for co-creation, sign a memorandum of cooperation, deliver by milestone and price by degree of customization. Don't let sales use the two contract templates the wrong way around.

京ICP备2026014272号